Urban Health Today Editors

Urban Health Today

Interventions that paired community-based health workers with low-income and minority patients with cancer improved quality of life and may be a more effective and sustainable way to ensure cancer care, according to an <a href="https://meetinglibrary.asco.org/embargo/record/201673/abstract">abstract</a> from the 2021 American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Quality Care Symposium.Specifically, patients partnered with community healthcare workers had greater improvement in quality of life, increased engagement in their own care (patient activation), lower acute care use, and emergency department use compared with patients who were not paired healthcare workers.Manali I. Patel, MD, of Stanford University, and colleagues conducted patient interviews with 160 patients to assess health-related quality of life and patient activation and used claims data to assess healthcare use. Patients were obtained through an employer-union health fund; patients had newly diagnosed hematologic and solid tumor cancers and were randomly assigned to a six-month intervention or to usual care.The intervention, known as LEAPS (Lay health workers Engage educate and Activate Patients to Share), uses community health workers trained to encourage and support patients to engage in their own cancer care, and discuss advanced care planning and symptom burden with cancer clinicians. The health workers also connect patients with community-based resources to help overcome complications from social determinants of health&mdash;the circumstances in which people are born, live, and work, which includes social, economic, and physical factors that have a direct impact on health and healthcare outcomes.At four months, the intervention group had greater improvements in quality of life compared with usual care (difference in difference: 9.56; P&lt;0.001), greater patient activation (difference in difference 12.43; P&lt;0.001), lower acute care use (P=0.02), and lower emergency department use (P=0.03) than those assigned to usual care.&ldquo;The intervention is an example of how collaborations with communities, employers, and health plans can yield novel approaches to overcome inequities in cancer care delivery,&rdquo; Patel said in a press release. &ldquo;Such interventions can be expanded to other communities in collaboration with community-based cancer clinics and health plans&mdash;such as state-based Medicaid organizations and local employers.&rdquo;

Payton White, BS

How Sleep Quality Influences Risk of Alzheimer’s Disease

Alzheimer's & Dementia

Lou Portero

Hidden Dangers: The Blood Sugar Crisis in Modern Breast Cancer Treatment

Diabetes in Women

New ACG Guidelines Address Critical Gastric Cancer Disparities in Non-White Americans

Gastroenterology

Latest News

Low-Income, Minority Populations Benefit From Integration of Community-Based Interventions

Cancer

Interventions that paired community-based health workers with low-income and minority patients with cancer improved ...

About Us

Editorial Policy

Contributors & Partners

Contact Us

eNewsletters

Work With Us

Advertising

Career Center

GU Oncology Now

Blood Cancers Today

Cancer Nursing Today

DocWire News

MashupMD

Food Allergy Roundtable Discussions

Allergy

Blood Cancers

— Multiple Myeloma

Breast Cancer

Colorectal Cancer

Pancreatic Cancer

Prostate Cancer

Diabetes

Heart Failure

Heart Disease Prevention

Heart Health

— Alzheimer’s Disease

Neurology

Public Health

Autoimmune Disease

Infectious Diseases

Obesity

Pediatrics

Sickle Cell Disease

Digital Health

Dermatology

Pulmonology

Video Insights

Workforce News

More

Gynecologic Cancer

Heart Disease in Women

Menopause

Reproductive Health

Women’s Neurology

Well Woman Today

Roundtables

Podcasts

Conferences

Viewpoints

Subscribe